The following list shows A4's recent advocacy. This list contains both publications (including briefs and submissions) and communications (letters & emails).

To find a (free) disability advocate to help you, try:

The Autism Spectrum: the case for both profound and complex labels

By convenor |

When the DSM-5 was published in 2013, it combined most of the previous "pervasive developmental disorders" under a single label, autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It indicated that parts A & B of its diagnosis criteria should each get separate severity ratings: 1, 2 or 3. And the diagnosis reports should also indicate with/without intellectual and/or language impairment (see https://a4.org.au/dsm5-asd). 

NDIS's key worker model is just bureaucratic fantasy

By bobb |

The NDIS often espouses a "key worker" model for delivering multi- or trans-disciplinary therapy for children with autism or developmental delay. Sometimes, the expectation of key worker services are written into NDIS plans. 

The NDIS does not describe what this means. Searching the NDIS website finds no useful information. The NDIS's response to a Freedom of Information request for their information about key worker model showed they

unfair/unreasonable NDIS Compensation recovery legislation

By convenor |

Dear NDIS Ministers

Subject: unfair/unreasonable NDIS Compensation recovery legislation

I write to express deep disappointment and alarm at how the NDIS is using its compensation recovery legislation – Chapter 5 — Compensation payments of the NDIS Act 2013. I am aware of the NDIS “recovering” and thereby profiting from compensation for sexual abuse of individuals with disability who were sexually abused and subsequently compensated. 

A4's submissions on Butler's NDIS Bill

By convenor |

Autism Aspergers Advocacy Australia (A4) made submissions and appeared before the Senate Committee. Like the rest of the disability sector, A4 expressed extremely strong opposition to Labor's proposed legislation. 

A4's representative, Bob Buckley, appeared before the Committee at 12noon on 10/6/2026 ... together with representatives from the Australian Autism Alliance and SWAN/EAC. 

Attorney-general disavows responsibility for the recently-created Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)

By convenor |

Recent communication with the Attorney-General shows major disinterest in whether the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) that the government created in 2024 works effectively. 

A4's major concerns with the operation of the ART's NDIS division include:

ART allows arbitrary delay in making its decisions

By convenor |

The email chain below shows Bob Buckley's email discussion with the ART about delays in Members making decisions following a final hearing in NDIS matters. The ART says there is no time constraint. 

The heads of the ART and the NDIS division have not responded. The Attorney-General is also uninterested. 

There is an old legal maxim that says "Justice delayed is justice denied". The principle of timely decisions was established in the Magna Carta, the foundation of our legal system.